斯蒂夫•卡拉布雷西（Steve G. Calabresi），耶鲁大学法学博士，曾在里根和老布什时期任前司法部长Edwin Meese III的顾问。现为美国联邦主义者协会（The Federalist Society）联合创始人、理事会主席；《美国比较法期刊》编辑；美国西北大学宪法学教授，布朗大学宪法学客座教授。 译者简介： 李松锋，法学博士，清华大学公共管理学院博士后、助理研究员。

Originalism and living constitutionalism, so often understood to be diametrically opposing views of our nation's founding document, are not in conflict--they are compatible. So argues Jack Balkin, one of the leading constitutional scholars of our time, in this long-awaited book. Step by step, Balkin gracefully outlines a constitutional theory that demonstrates why modern concep...(展开全部)

欧内斯特·范·登·哈格，博士，福德汉姆大学的约翰·M·奥林法学与公共政策研究中心教授(1983年写作本书时)，遗产基金会方面的著名学者。曾任教于纽约大学、纽约法学院、瓦瑟学院和新社会调查学院等。著有The Jewish Mystique Punishing Criminals他还参撰了40多部著作的部分章节，写了无数的文章，散见于《纽约时报》、《哈伯杂志》(Harper’s)、《大西洋月刊》、《财富》和《国家评论》等，以及许多法律杂志和学术类出版物。

In this book, Spencer Case and Matt Lutz debate whether objective moral facts exist. We often say that actions like murder and institutions like slavery are morally wrong. And sometimes people strenuously disagree about the moral status of actions, as with abortion. But what, if anything, makes statements about morality true? Should we be realists about morality, or anti-realis...(展开全部)

欧内斯特·范·登·哈格，博士，福德汉姆大学的约翰·M·奥林法学与公共政策研究中心教授(1983年写作本书时)，遗产基金会方面的著名学者。曾任教于纽约大学、纽约法学院、瓦瑟学院和新社会调查学院等。著有The Jewish Mystique Punishing Criminals他还参撰了40多部著作的部分章节，写了无数的文章，散见于《纽约时报》、《哈伯杂志》(Harper’s)、《大西洋月刊》、《财富》和《国家评论》等，以及许多法律杂志和学术类出版物。

In this book, Spencer Case and Matt Lutz debate whether objective moral facts exist. We often say that actions like murder and institutions like slavery are morally wrong. And sometimes people strenuously disagree about the moral status of actions, as with abortion. But what, if anything, makes statements about morality true? Should we be realists about morality, or anti-realis...(展开全部)

What is consciousness and why is it so philosophically and scientifically puzzling? For many years philosophers approached this question assuming a standard physicalist framework on which consciousness can be explained by contemporary physics, biology, neuroscience, and cognitive science. This book is a debate between two philosophers who are united in their rejection of this k...(展开全部)

作者:(英)罗宾·缪尔 译者:朵朵 罗宾·缪尔(Robin Muir)是英国版《Vogue》杂志的特约编辑，也是一位顶尖的摄影学者。他在英国国家肖像艺廊、维多利亚与阿尔伯特博物馆、伦敦博物馆和美国耶鲁英国艺术中心策划过大型展览。他的著作包括《影响之下：约翰·迪金、摄影和索霍区的诱惑》(2014年)、《Vogue模特》(2013年)、《Vogue封面》(2009年)、《镜头下：斯诺登伯爵和英国艺术世界》(2007年)、《世界上被拍摄最多的人》(2005年)、《诺曼·帕金森：时尚人像》(2004年)、《Vogue中的人物》(2003年)、《看不见的Vogue》(2002年)和《大卫·贝利：追逐彩虹》(2001年)。

For those that have some knowledge of the philosophical arguments concerning rights, this book is a clear and well-written contribution to the continuing debate between the interest and will theories. The first third of the book is written by Kramer and split into two main sections; first, a robust defence of the Hohfeldian analytical framework and second, an equally firm propo...(展开全部)